Download PDF ← Back to profile
TissueScope · Protocol profile

Saccharum officinarum

Tissue culture protocol profile built from the published literature
FamilyPoaceae
AuthoritySaccharum officinarum L., 1753
Common namessugarcane, noble cane, Cavameneñu, Kō, Sugar Cane, Sugarcane
Literature scanned16 Oct 2026
Report generated17 Oct 2026
Verified records
120
11 from full text
Papers
83
2004 – 2026
Evidence
Strong
85 protocols graded
Grade A / B / C
4 / 11 / 70
A = 3+ papers agree

Every figure was extracted from a published sentence by a rule-based reader, re-derived by a second independent reader, and kept only if both agreed. Unclear sentences were skipped, not guessed. Check the cited paper and validate on your own material before relying on any protocol.

Key findings

Recommended workflow

1
Surface sterilization Evidence C 1 paper
70% ethanol · 30 s → 1% NaOCl · 1 min
Reported by a single paper; treat as a lead to check, not an established protocol.
2
Callus induction Evidence A 5 papers
MS with 3 mg/L 2,4-D. Median response 91%
Three or more independent papers report this protocol with consistent outcomes. Hormone balance: auxin only.
3
Somatic embryogenesis Evidence C 1 paper
MS with 4 mg/L 2,4-D. Median response 40%
Reported by a single paper; treat as a lead to check, not an established protocol. Hormone balance: auxin only.
4
Shoot regeneration & multiplication Evidence B 2 papers
MS (0.5× strength) with 5 mg/L NAA. Median response 92%
Two independent papers report this protocol. Hormone balance: auxin only.
5
Rooting Evidence A 3 papers
Medium not stated with 5 mg/L NAA
Three or more independent papers report this protocol with consistent outcomes. Hormone balance: auxin only.
6
Acclimatization Evidence A 14 papers
Not specified substrate; survival 91%
Three or more independent papers report this protocol with consistent outcomes.

Surface sterilization

#GradeStepsAsepticPapers
1C70% ethanol · 30 s → 1% NaOCl · 1 min—1
2*C75% ethanol · 30 s → 5% NaOCl · 4 min—1
3*C70% ethanol · 30 s → 10% NaOCl · 10 min—1
4*C4% NaOCl · 60 min → 95% ethanol · 5 min—1
5*C0.1% HgCl2 · 30 min—1
6C0.1% HgCl2 · 10 min—1
“Surface sterilization involved 70% ethanol (30 s), 1% sodium hypochlorite (1 min), rinsing twice in sterile distilled water, and drying on sterilized filter paper ().” [8]

Callus induction

#GradeGrowth regulatorsExplantMediumOutcomePapers
1A2,4-D 3 mg/L—MS91%5
2A2,4-D 3 mg/L—-95% (92-97)3
3BBAP 1 mg/L—MS100%2
4CBAP 2 mg/LNAA 1 mg/L—-100%1
5C2,4-D 5 mg/L—MS85%1
6CGA3 1 mg/LKinetin 0.5 mg/L—MS70%1
7C2,4-D 2.5 mg/L—-50%1
8C2,4-D 4.5 mg/L—MS80%1
“Immature cutting cane stems after 10 days of putting on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog) supplemented 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 3 mg/L triggered the highest rate of explants inducing callus (91.11%).” [1]
“Callus formation was the maximum on MS + 3 mg/l 2,4-D.” [2]

Somatic embryogenesis

#GradeGrowth regulatorsExplantMediumOutcomePapers
1C2,4-D 4 mg/L—MS, 30 g/L sucrose40%1
“The results are showed that the optimal induction of embryogenic callus on medium MS + sucrose 30 g / L + CH 300 ppm + 300 ppm PVP + 2,4-D 4 ppm as indicated by the high percentage of explants forming embryogenic callus that is equal to 40% and the respective concentration 2 ppm and 3 ppm is 33,3% and 37,5%.” [3]

Shoot regeneration & multiplication

#GradeGrowth regulatorsExplantMediumOutcomePapers
1BNAA 5 mg/L—MS x0.5, 50 g/L sucrose92%2
2*BBAP 1 mg/LIBA 0.5 mg/L—MS43.4 shoots/explant2
3BBAP 2 mg/LNAA 0.5 mg/L—MSoptimum reported, no figure2
4BNAA 2.5 mg/L—MS x0.590%; 30 d2
5CBAP 2 mg/L—-91%1
6CNAA 10 mg/L—MS93%; 33.3 shoots/explant1
7CTDZ 10 mg/L—-80%1
8CNAA 9 mg/L—-90%; 25.5 shoots/explant1
“Maximum 92% shoot cultures developed vigorous root system on ½ strength MS liquid medium containing 50 g/l sucrose and 5.0 mg/l NAA.” [4]
“Maximum 92% shoot cultures developed vigorous root system on 1/2 strength MS liquid medium containing 50 g/l su-crose and 5.0 mg/l NAA.” [5]

Rooting

#GradeGrowth regulatorsExplantMediumOutcomePapers
1ANAA 5 mg/L—-13.5 roots/shoot3
2BNAA 5 mg/L—MS x0.5, 60 g/L sucrose87% (80-94)2
3BNAA 1 mg/LIBA 2 mg/L—-97%2
4BNAA 1 mg/LIBA 2 mg/L—MS100%2
5BNAA 5 mg/L—MSoptimum reported, no figure2
6BNAA 3 mg/L—-1%2
7CIBA 2.5 mg/L—MS x0.5, 60 g/L sucrose87%1
8CBAP 2 mg/L—-89%1
“Rooting was most successful with 5.0 mg/L Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) which resulted in an average of 9.36 roots per shoot in Isd 40.” [6]
“For C86-12 genotype 5 mgl-1 NAA alone has gave best number of roots (17.8) and root length (3.2 cm).” [7]

Acclimatization

#GradeSubstrateSurvivalPapers
1ANot specified91% (88–100)14
2BSoil88% (85–90)2
3CCompost + soil (2:8)100%1
4CCompost + garden soil (2:8)96%1
“The hardened plants were transferred to green-house conditions where they survived with 90% frequency.” [9]
“Rooted shoots were transplanted in the green house for hardening and their survival rate was 90% in the field condition.” [10]

Typical growth regulator doses

One value per paper. Range is the interquartile range with three or more papers, otherwise min–max.

Shoot regeneration & multiplication

RegulatorPapersRange, mg/LMedian
BAP230.75–1.751
NAA200.5–3.51.5
Kinetin80.5–10.75
IBA50.5–0.50.5
TDZ31–5.51
GA320.5–0.50.5
IAA10.1–0.10.1

Callus induction

RegulatorPapersRange, mg/LMedian
2,4-D133–43
BAP60.813–21.5
Kinetin40.5–0.6250.5
Picloram21.087–42.543
GA311–11
NAA11–11

Rooting

RegulatorPapersRange, mg/LMedian
NAA191–53
IBA81.375–22
BAP31.5–22
IAA21–53
GA311–11

Somatic embryogenesis

RegulatorPapersRange, mg/LMedian
2,4-D14–44

Dose-response trends

Median outcome by dose band, one vote per paper. Papers differ in medium and explant, so read these as trends, not controlled optima.

Shoot regeneration & multiplication · NAA (moderate confidence)

< 0.25 mg/L80 n=1
2–4 mg/L85.6 n=4
4–8 mg/L87.7 n=4
≥ 8 mg/L91.7 n=1

Outcome keeps rising up to the highest dose reported; the optimum may lie above what papers have tested. Outcome: response (%).

Rooting · NAA (moderate confidence)

1–2 mg/L100 n=3
2–4 mg/L36.3 n=2
4–8 mg/L87 n=2
≥ 8 mg/L76 n=1

No clear dose pattern: outcomes go up and down between dose bands, so differences between papers (medium, explant, genotype) probably matter more than dose. Outcome: response (%).

Points to double-check

References for quoted evidence

  1. Ha Van Tran, Phuong Hoang Phi Cung, Bui Van Le (2013) Transformation of callus sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens – Mediated method and regeneration of transgenic shoot. Science and Technology Development Journal · doi:10.32508/stdj.v16i1.1398
  2. Mohashweta Roy, Md Shakhawat Hossain, Avrodip Biswas, et al. (2011) Plant Regeneration through Somatic Embryogenesis from Leaf Sheath Derived Callus of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) var. Isd -16. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology · doi:10.3329/ptcb.v21i2.10237
  3. Wardatus Sholeha, Bambang Sugiharto, Dwi Setyati, et al. (2015) Induction Somatic Embryogenesis Used 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) and Kinetin in Spindle Leaf Explant Sugarcane. Jurnal ILMU DASAR · doi:10.19184/jid.v16i1.1387
  4. Yukti Hari Gupta, Archana, S. Malhotra, et al. (2024) Hormonal Manipulation for Rapid Micropropagation of a New Sugarcane Variety CoS 17231. Agrica · doi:10.5958/2394-448x.2024.00016.5
  5. Yukti Goel, Mohan Lal, B.L. Sharma (2015) Hormonal manipulation for rapid micropropagation of sugarcane varieties CoS 99259 and CoSe 01235. Biotech Today · doi:10.5958/2322-0996.2015.00029.0
  6. Rebina Ferdous, Md. Jakir Hossain, A. K. M. Nazmul Huda, et al. (2025) In vitro regeneration of some promising genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.) in Bangladesh. Plant Science Today · doi:10.14719/pst.9027
  7. Dereje Shimelis (2015) Interaction Effect of Indole-3-Butyric Acid and ?-Naphthalene Acetic Acid on In Vitro Rooting of Two Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) Genotypes. Advances in Crop Science and Technology · doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000s1-001
  8. Verma R, Kushwaha KPS, Kumar S, Rawat S (2026) Evaluation of organic vinegar treatments and black gram [<i>Vigna mungo</i> (L.) Hepper] genotypes for the management of pod rot disease caused by <i>Fusarium humuli</i>.. Frontiers in plant science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1647478
  9. Arjun, Rao Srinath (2015) Callus Induction and Organogenesis in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) var 93v297. International Letters of Natural Sciences · doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilns.48.14
  10. B H Kambaska, S Santilata (2009) Rapid In vitro Micro propagation of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L. cv- Nayana) Through Callus Culture.
How to read this report.